rfc-9036

Changing the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Location Profiles Registry Policy

R. Gellens
date2021-06 streamIETF areaart wgecrit statusPROPOSED STANDARD pages4 canonicalhttps://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9036 doi10.17487/RFC9036
This document changes the policy of the "Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Location Profiles" IANA registry established by RFC 5222 from Standards Action to Specification Required. This allows standards development organizations (SDOs) other than the IETF to add new values.

updates

Extracted elements (6)

design-rationale §1

The registry policy was changed from Standards Action to Specification Required because NENA, an SDO that makes significant use of LoST in emergency call specifications, identified a need for additional location profiles that the previous policy blocked. Specification Required allows non-IETF SDOs to contribute values without requiring a Standards Track RFC.

registry

normative-requirement §4 REQUIRED

The Expert Reviewer for new registry entries must verify that the proposed value is specified by the IETF, NENA, or a similar SDO in which location profiles are in scope.

registry

normative-requirement §4 REQUIRED

The Expert Reviewer must verify that the profile specification is unambiguous and interoperable.

registry

normative-requirement §4 REQUIRED

The Expert Reviewer must verify that the proposed new location profile value has a clear need, which includes there not being an existing profile that already meets that need.

registry

registry §4

The 'Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Location Profiles' IANA registry, originally established by RFC 5222 with a Standards Action policy, is updated by this document to Specification Required. This allows SDOs other than the IETF (such as NENA) to add new location profile values.

registry

security-consideration §3

No new security considerations are identified by this change in registry policy from Standards Action to Specification Required.

security, registry